• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


biodreamer last won the day on May 25

biodreamer had the most liked content!

About biodreamer

  • Rank
    Level 7 Stud

Contact Methods

  • Bricksafe URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • Interests
    Software development, Games of all types (Computer,videogame,board games,..),Movies,Lego .
  • Favourite Set(s)
    6987-1, 375-2, 6085-1,6986-1,6985-1

Recent Profile Visitors

307 profile views
  1. Well that would turn Nathans job into a management position more then it is already today running all the admins and moderators today. I think it's better that he works on adding good tools for the community to contribute with. rather then having to manage and test all "code snippets" the community want to plugin. where most probably have a negative impact on the server performance due to not really understand the full complexity of the source code. If you have some cool functionality idea you can probably outsource it to your own software/app/webpage by using Rebrickables Rest API. When you done that successfully you can show that to Nathan and perhaps get it integrated as a new feature.
  2. I agree there should be a window of a week or so when signing up for contributing with a set. If you signup for adding a set task and as long as you keep updating new stuff the task is owned by you. if nothing is added in a week the owner ship is released and anyone can request to continue the task. (not losing any work). Beyond that a user should be able to request a takeover which the task owner either can accept or reject. if they accept it, the task owner ship is transferred as is. ie with whatever work the first owner did. ie this way one can do inventory and then transfer to a another which do the photos.
  3. How old are your computer? 30 seconds is not normal startup for even most heavy softwares, I mean windows takes less that to start from cold boot, so either your computer is ancient or you have something very wrong with it. if you have privacy issues you shouldn't really have installed windows 10. because it's worse then 7 and 8.... I don't think you can trust it even if you toggle of all those settings that are ON by default. I guess that is a more and more avoidable future with more and more software running google analytics or similar kits which is a kind of boxed spyware because it tell the author how you use the program as well as any problems you encounter.
  4. Isn't the sort order a bit weird on that screenshot? I tried that query with my collection and it ended up fine. 12 pages ranging from 100% to 0% but I found this in the list: That's NOT technic.
  5. there is several very common parts that cause this. try a black 1x2 plate or some of the other common bricks/plates. i think the queries need to be preprocessed or limited to work on these.
  6. Hi you could abuse the system a bit by adding a "wanted" set list and put the set your planning to buy in it. and then rerun the build. Then when they are bought and has arrived simply drag them over to any other set list. Simply toggle the build mode for the set list to run with current or the near future inventory. or if it's just a few add them manually to the build query by typing in their set numbers in the extra fields.
  7. The blue is the lower part of a Fabuland roof.
  8. Another approach would be import it into or any ldraw that support ldd import and make the steps yourself before handing it to your son.
  9. Personally I think it should be more levels on each badge so they don't end up being so logarithmic.10,100,1000 is way to steep climb where many user don't feel that they progress. 10 shouldn't be a problem 100 takes some effort but it takes years or a very hugh income to go to a 1000 sets besides why isn't it anything beyond a 1000? there are some of us that reached maximum day 1. Same applies to MOCs making instruction for 1000 sets even if they are small is most likely taking a year or more to produce. Having badges that takes so long to acquire is counter productive. its better to have many small steps then very hugh ones.
  10. The pictures I have submitted was appearing after about a day. any approval step is silent you won't notice it if it exist.
  11. How about simply exclude any previous shown result that month. Personally I rather see the whole feature gone or at least bumped down below the news, I will not buy premium and isn't really a fan of large technic builds and when google fails with all their engineers to figure out what I like, I would deem that your bound to fail and waste space on the first page independent of what algorithm you put there.
  12. I am sure you can find someone that has one quite easily if you don't have one at work or at the local library.
  13. I made this suggestion: I think it will improve images of some parts where size is hard to see and won't harm the rest.
  14. fine tuning my suggestion a bit: I vote for combining all sets in the super set as a number 42057+42061+42063-1 so we could have super sets like 42057x2-1 for those super sets that build something of multiple copies of a set. Order of sets in combination should be ascending, so we don't get all the different combination of ordering.
  15. I vote for combining all sets in the super set as a number 42057-42061-42063-1 which would allow the super set to come up as a result independent on which set you searched on. it also would open up for a common way of marking up any other superset, may it be MOCS or any created by LEGO that is missing number. Superset shouldn't really contain more then 2-4 sets.